You remember that weird stretch in the 2022 NFL season when nothing made sense? That Sunday in October when the supposedly struggling Washington Commanders walked into Lambeau Field and punched the Green Bay Packers in the mouth? Yeah, that game.
The final score read Commanders 23, Packers 21, but the box score told a much bigger story. Quarterback decisions, red-zone execution, clock control, defensive pressure every single stat carried weight. If you love breaking down player numbers and spotting momentum swings, this matchup delivered plenty to chew on.
Let’s unpack every meaningful stat from that showdown and figure out what really happened.
Contents
- 1 Game Overview: Commanders 23, Packers 21
- 2 Quarterback Breakdown: Efficiency vs Frustration
- 3 Running Game: Washington’s Edge
- 4 Receiving Leaders: Who Stepped Up?
- 5 Defensive Impact: Pressure Changes Everything
- 6 Red Zone Efficiency: The Real Difference
- 7 Time of Possession and Game Control
- 8 Turnovers and Discipline
- 9 Complete Player Stats Summary Table
- 10 Coaching Strategy: Risk vs Control
- 11 Momentum Swings: Where the Game Turned
- 12 Statistical Comparison: Head-to-Head Breakdown
- 13 What the Stats Reveal Beyond the Score
- 14 Personal Take: Why This Game Still Matters
- 15 Final Thoughts on Washington Commanders vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats
Game Overview: Commanders 23, Packers 21
Washington entered Week 7 with a 2–4 record and plenty of criticism. Green Bay entered with playoff expectations and a quarterback named Aaron Rodgers who rarely lost at home.
Washington controlled tempo, forced key turnovers, and capitalized in high-pressure moments. Green Bay moved the ball at times, but Washington’s defense stiffened inside the 20-yard line.
You can’t fake a two-point win in Lambeau. The numbers backed everything up.
Quarterback Breakdown: Efficiency vs Frustration
Taylor Heinicke’s Grit-Fueled Performance
Taylor Heinicke didn’t light up the stat sheet, but he executed exactly what Washington needed.
He completed 20 of 33 passes for 201 yards and 2 touchdowns. He threw 1 interception, but he attacked the middle of the field effectively and kept drives alive. He also added 29 rushing yards on scrambles that extended key possessions.
Heinicke played controlled football. He took what Green Bay’s secondary allowed and avoided forcing risky throws. He delivered both touchdown passes in rhythm and made decisive reads.
IMO, that performance defined situational quarterbacking.
Aaron Rodgers’ Tough Afternoon
Rodgers finished with 23 completions on 35 attempts for 194 yards and 2 touchdowns. He also threw 1 interception.
Those numbers look decent at first glance. But context matters.
Rodgers averaged just 5.5 yards per attempt. Washington’s defense limited explosive plays and forced Green Bay to grind out long drives. Rodgers struggled under pressure and rarely found receivers behind the defense.
He threw a critical interception to Kendall Fuller, and Washington flipped momentum immediately afterward.
Rodgers didn’t implode. Washington simply outplayed him when it counted.
Running Game: Washington’s Edge
Brian Robinson Jr. Sets the Tone
Brian Robinson Jr. carried the ball 20 times for 73 yards and scored 1 touchdown.
He averaged just 3.7 yards per carry, but he ran with power. He attacked the interior and forced Green Bay to respect the run. That physical presence opened play-action opportunities for Heinicke.
Robinson didn’t post highlight-reel stats. He controlled tempo.
Antonio Gibson’s Versatility
Antonio Gibson added 10 carries for 59 yards and caught 2 passes for 7 yards.
Gibson averaged 5.9 yards per carry, which made a noticeable difference. He created chunk gains and helped Washington sustain drives in the second half.
Washington’s balanced rushing attack kept Rodgers watching from the sideline.
Aaron Jones vs AJ Dillon
On Green Bay’s side, Aaron Jones ran 8 times for 23 yards and caught 9 passes for 53 yards and a touchdown.
Jones contributed heavily as a receiver, but Green Bay abandoned the ground game early.
AJ Dillon logged 4 carries for 15 yards.
Green Bay’s play-calling leaned heavily on Rodgers’ arm. Washington benefited from that imbalance.
Receiving Leaders: Who Stepped Up?
Terry McLaurin Delivers in Clutch Moments
Terry McLaurin caught 5 passes for 73 yards.
He made tough catches in traffic and stretched the field when Washington needed breathing room. Heinicke trusted him on third downs.
McLaurin didn’t score, but he controlled coverage attention.
Curtis Samuel and the Red-Zone Impact
Curtis Samuel hauled in 5 receptions for 52 yards and 1 touchdown.
He exploited short and intermediate routes. Washington used him creatively near the goal line, and he delivered.
Rookie Contribution: Jahan Dotson
Jahan Dotson grabbed 3 catches for 43 yards and 1 touchdown.
Dotson’s touchdown reception gave Washington critical breathing room. He showed composure beyond his years.
Green Bay’s Passing Targets
Romeo Doubs caught 3 passes for 38 yards and a touchdown.
Green Bay lacked consistent separation outside of short routes. Washington’s secondary stayed disciplined.
Defensive Impact: Pressure Changes Everything
Washington’s defense deserves serious credit.
Montez Sweat Creates Chaos
Montez Sweat registered 1 sack and multiple pressures.
He disrupted Rodgers’ rhythm repeatedly. He forced quick throws and collapsed the pocket late in drives.
Jonathan Allen’s Interior Presence
Jonathan Allen dominated inside.
He controlled gaps, limited rushing lanes, and forced Rodgers to move off his spot.
Kendall Fuller’s Interception
Fuller’s interception shifted momentum immediately.
He read Rodgers’ eyes, jumped the route, and secured the turnover at a critical juncture.
Turnovers win close games. Fuller proved that rule again.
Red Zone Efficiency: The Real Difference
Washington converted 2 of 3 red-zone trips into touchdowns.
Green Bay reached the red zone multiple times but stalled. The Packers settled for field goals when Washington forced tight coverage and disciplined tackling.
Washington finished drives. Green Bay didn’t.
That stat alone explains the final score.
Time of Possession and Game Control
Washington controlled the clock for over 32 minutes.
Green Bay held the ball for roughly 27 minutes.
Those extra possessions mattered. Washington’s offense stayed on the field and kept Rodgers sidelined during key stretches.
You can’t score when you don’t touch the ball.
Turnovers and Discipline
Each team committed one turnover.
Washington’s turnover came on Heinicke’s interception. Green Bay’s turnover came at a far more damaging moment.
Washington also played disciplined football. The Commanders limited costly penalties in high-leverage situations.
Green Bay failed to capitalize on Washington’s mistake.
Complete Player Stats Summary Table
Below you’ll find a full statistical summary of the key contributors from the matchup.
| Player | Team | Passing (C/ATT-YDS-TD-INT) | Rushing (CAR-YDS-TD) | Receiving (REC-YDS-TD) | Notable Defensive Stats |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Heinicke | Commanders | 20/33 – 201 – 2 – 1 | 4 – 29 – 0 | ||
| Aaron Rodgers | Packers | 23/35 – 194 – 2 – 1 | 1 – 4 – 0 | ||
| Brian Robinson Jr. | Commanders | 20 – 73 – 1 | 2 – 12 – 0 | ||
| Antonio Gibson | Commanders | 10 – 59 – 0 | 2 – 7 – 0 | ||
| Aaron Jones | Packers | 8 – 23 – 0 | 9 – 53 – 1 | ||
| AJ Dillon | Packers | 4 – 15 – 0 | 2 – 14 – 0 | ||
| Terry McLaurin | Commanders | 5 – 73 – 0 | |||
| Curtis Samuel | Commanders | 2 – 7 – 0 | 5 – 52 – 1 | ||
| Jahan Dotson | Commanders | 3 – 43 – 1 | |||
| Romeo Doubs | Packers | 3 – 38 – 1 | |||
| Montez Sweat | Commanders | 1 Sack | |||
| Kendall Fuller | Commanders | 1 INT |
Coaching Strategy: Risk vs Control
Washington leaned into balance.
They ran the ball consistently. They used short passing concepts. They limited explosive mistakes.
Green Bay relied heavily on Rodgers’ arm. They struggled to establish the run. They attempted to win through the air without stretching the defense vertically.
That approach didn’t work.
Washington executed its plan. Green Bay adjusted too late.
Momentum Swings: Where the Game Turned
Three moments shifted the outcome:
-
Fuller’s interception
-
Dotson’s touchdown reception
-
Washington’s defensive stand in the fourth quarter
Each moment involved execution under pressure.
Washington seized opportunities. Green Bay hesitated.
Statistical Comparison: Head-to-Head Breakdown
Let’s simplify the comparison:
-
Washington scored 23 points on 364 total yards
-
Green Bay scored 21 points on 232 total yards
-
Washington rushed for 166 yards
-
Green Bay rushed for 38 yards
That rushing disparity jumps off the page.
Washington dictated physicality. Green Bay reacted.
What the Stats Reveal Beyond the Score
You don’t beat Rodgers at Lambeau by accident.
Washington won because:
-
They controlled time of possession.
-
They forced one critical turnover.
-
They ran the ball effectively.
-
They executed in the red zone.
-
They pressured the quarterback consistently.
Those five factors show up repeatedly in winning formulas across the league.
The numbers tell a clean story.
Personal Take: Why This Game Still Matters
I still remember watching that fourth quarter and thinking, “Are they really about to pull this off?”
Washington didn’t dominate in flashy fashion. They played smart football. They trusted their system. They stayed patient.
Green Bay looked frustrated. Rodgers rarely shows visible irritation, but you could sense it.
That game highlighted how balance beats reputation.
Final Thoughts on Washington Commanders vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats
The Washington Commanders vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats reveal far more than a narrow two-point win.
Washington executed with discipline and balance. Heinicke managed the game effectively. Robinson and Gibson controlled the ground attack. McLaurin and Samuel delivered timely plays. The defense applied relentless pressure.
Green Bay leaned too heavily on Rodgers. They failed to establish the run. They stalled in the red zone.
Football rarely rewards name recognition. Football rewards execution.
Washington executed.
And sometimes, that’s all it takes to shock Lambeau Field.
