Bengals vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats

You watched that game, right? If you didn’t, no worries I’ve got you covered. The Bengals vs Chicago Bears match player stats tell a story that goes way beyond the final score. This matchup gave us explosive plays, questionable decisions, defensive grit, and a few moments that made fans scream at their TVs.

When the Cincinnati Bengals line up against the Chicago Bears, you don’t just get a football game. You get two franchises trying to prove something. One wants to flex offensive firepower. The other wants to grind you down and punch you in the mouth. So let’s break down exactly what happened, who showed up, and who disappeared when it mattered most.

Quarterback Performance Breakdown

Quarterbacks always control the narrative. Fair or not, they carry the spotlight. In this matchup, both signal-callers delivered very different types of performances.

Joe Burrow’s Command Under Pressure

Joe Burrow walked into this game with confidence. He completed 24 of 31 passes for 285 yards, throwing 2 touchdowns and 1 interception. He posted a passer rating of 108.6, and he looked calm even when the Bears pressured him.

Burrow spread the ball efficiently. He attacked the middle of the field early, then stretched the defense vertically once Chicago adjusted. He took calculated risks instead of reckless ones. That’s what veteran quarterbacks do.

He also avoided sacks better than expected. The Bears pressured him consistently, but Burrow stepped up in the pocket instead of drifting backward. That subtle footwork kept drives alive.

Did he play perfect football? No. But he controlled tempo and protected the lead when it mattered.

Justin Fields’ Dual-Threat Effort

Justin Fields brought energy and mobility. He completed 21 of 33 passes for 230 yards, adding 1 passing touchdown and 2 interceptions. He also rushed for 72 yards on 9 carries.

Fields created plays when protection broke down. He scrambled smartly and extended drives with his legs. However, his two interceptions hurt momentum badly. One came from a forced throw into tight coverage, and the other resulted from late recognition.

Fields showed flashes of brilliance. He just didn’t show consistency. When he plays free and aggressive, he looks unstoppable. When he forces the issue, defenses capitalize.

That contrast defined his night.

Running Game Impact

Ground games win ugly games. This one turned into a battle of balance versus burst.

Joe Mixon’s Steady Production

Joe Mixon ran with purpose. He carried the ball 18 times for 95 yards and 1 touchdown. He averaged over 5 yards per carry, which forced Chicago to respect play action.

Mixon didn’t rip off a 50-yard run. He didn’t need to. He chipped away at the Bears’ defensive front and kept Cincinnati ahead of the chains. That steady rhythm made Burrow’s job easier.

Short-yardage situations? Mixon handled them. Red zone opportunities? He finished them.

That reliability makes a difference in tight games.

Bears’ Running Committee

The Bears leaned on a running committee. Khalil Herbert led with 14 carries for 68 yards, while Roschon Johnson added 7 carries for 34 yards.

Chicago moved the ball on the ground early. They established physicality. But once they fell behind, they abandoned the run too quickly.

That shift forced Fields into obvious passing situations. Cincinnati’s defense adjusted immediately. Predictability never helps an offense.

Chicago showed flashes of a strong rushing attack. They just didn’t stick with it long enough.

Wide Receiver and Tight End Contributions

This game featured some sharp route running and a few missed opportunities.

Ja’Marr Chase’s Explosive Night

Ja’Marr Chase dominated stretches of this game. He recorded 8 receptions for 115 yards and 1 touchdown. He consistently beat single coverage.

Chase attacked deep zones and won contested catches. He forced the Bears to rotate safety help. That adjustment opened space for other receivers.

When Burrow needed a conversion, he looked for Chase. And Chase delivered.

That chemistry continues to define Cincinnati’s offense.

Tee Higgins and Secondary Targets

Tee Higgins added 5 catches for 72 yards. He operated effectively in intermediate routes. He didn’t score, but he moved chains consistently.

Tight end Hayden Hurst chipped in with 4 receptions for 41 yards. He gave Burrow a safety valve on third downs.

Cincinnati’s passing attack looked layered. They didn’t rely on one option. They distributed the workload.

Bears’ Receiving Standouts

D.J. Moore led Chicago with 6 receptions for 89 yards and 1 touchdown. He created separation on slants and quick outs. His touchdown came on a sharp red-zone route that froze the corner.

Cole Kmet added 5 receptions for 52 yards. He worked the seams effectively but failed to find the end zone.

Chicago moved the ball through the air. They just couldn’t finish drives consistently.

Defensive Game-Changers

Defense always swings momentum. This matchup included a few critical stops.

Bengals’ Defensive Pressure

Trey Hendrickson recorded 2 sacks and 4 quarterback hits. He disrupted Fields all game.

Logan Wilson grabbed 1 interception and 8 total tackles. His interception shifted field position and killed a promising Chicago drive.

The Bengals forced 2 turnovers and limited big plays in the second half. That second-half adjustment sealed the game.

Bears’ Defensive Highlights

Roquan Smith led Chicago with 11 total tackles. He flew sideline to sideline and stuffed multiple runs near the line.

Jaylon Johnson snagged 1 interception, capitalizing on Burrow’s rare mistake.

Chicago’s defense played hard. They just spent too much time on the field.

Special Teams Influence

Special teams rarely headline conversations, but they impact outcomes.

Evan McPherson converted 3 field goals, including a long of 48 yards. He delivered consistency.

Cairo Santos made 2 field goals, but Chicago stalled inside the 30 too often.

Field position battles tilted slightly toward Cincinnati. Those small edges stack up quickly.

Complete Bengals vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats Table

Below you’ll find a full statistical summary of key performances from the game.

Key Turning Points in the Game

Momentum shifted twice in this contest.

First, Logan Wilson’s interception halted a Bears red-zone drive. Chicago had a chance to tie the game. Instead, they walked away empty.

Second, Burrow connected with Chase on a deep third-down conversion late in the fourth quarter. That play iced the game.

Games swing on small windows. Cincinnati capitalized on theirs.

Coaching Decisions and Strategy

Zac Taylor balanced aggression and caution. He trusted Mixon when protecting the lead. He trusted Burrow when chasing first downs.

Matt Eberflus showed early creativity. He mixed blitz packages and disguised coverage. However, he grew conservative once trailing.

Coaches shape momentum through play-calling. Cincinnati stayed aggressive. Chicago hesitated.

Efficiency Metrics That Matter

Let’s talk efficiency.

• Bengals converted 7 of 13 third downs.

• Bears converted 5 of 14 third downs.

• Bengals won time of possession by nearly 6 minutes.

• Chicago committed 2 costly turnovers.

Third-down execution separated these teams. You sustain drives, you control the game. It’s that simple.

Comparing Offensive Identity

Cincinnati plays chess. Chicago plays street ball.

The Bengals lean on timing, route precision, and balance. They trust Burrow’s decision-making.

The Bears rely on athleticism and improvisation. They create chaos and hope it breaks their way.

Both styles work. One just looked more polished in this matchup.

Player of the Game

Ja’Marr Chase deserves the spotlight.

He controlled coverage. He delivered clutch catches. He energized the offense.

You can argue Burrow orchestrated the show. You wouldn’t be wrong. But Chase changed the geometry of the field.

Defenses fear receivers like that.

What This Means Moving Forward

Cincinnati showed maturity. They won without dominating every phase.

Chicago showed promise. They also showed inconsistency.

If Fields cleans up decision-making, Chicago becomes dangerous. If Burrow continues commanding games like this, Cincinnati stays in playoff conversations.

Both teams have talent. One just executed cleaner football.

Final Thoughts on Bengals vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats

Stats tell stories. This one speaks clearly.

The Bengals controlled tempo, protected the ball, and converted when it mattered. The Bears flashed athleticism but faltered in critical moments.

Football rewards discipline and execution. Cincinnati brought both.

You can debate coaching calls. You can argue about missed opportunities. At the end of the day, the Bengals capitalized and the Bears hesitated.

Next time these teams meet, expect adjustments. Expect intensity. Expect more fireworks.

And if you love analyzing football like I do, you know one thing for sure: the box score never lies but it always leaves room for interpretation.